论坛风格切换切换到宽版
  • 604阅读
  • 0回复

[标准综合]MIL-STD-461E与461D的区别 [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
离线adderss
 

发帖
449
世科币
347
威望
153
贡献值
264
银元
0
只看楼主 倒序阅读 使用道具 楼主  发表于: 2023-07-26
  MIL-STD-461E ]*juF[r(  
=DE5 Wq19  
MIL-STD-461E: "DOD Interface Standard Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment" was published on August 20, 1999 and consolidates MIL-STD-461D and MIL-STD-462D into one Standard. The associated Data ITem Descriptions (DIDs) are as follows: lZ^XZjwoM  
|\?-k  
DID NUMBERDID TITLE BEPDyy  
(U!WD`Ym  
DI-EMCS-80199B Electromagnetic Interference Control Procedures (EMICP) 4x8mJ4[H^  
DI-EMCS-80200B Electromagnetic Interference Test Report (EMITR) ),bdj+wr78  
DI-EMCS-80201B Electromagnetic Interference Test Procedures (EMITP) q7 Uu 8JXF  
DKIDLf  
Major changes MIL-STD-461D/462D to MIL-STD-461E: * I'O_D  
An]*J|nFIY  
    isc]
  1. EUT hardware and software must be representative of production. Susceptibility scan rates and the frequency of measurement system test checks were revised.
f=/S]o4/3  
qf2 4l&}  
· Conducted Emissions 0C3Yina9 *  
*WX6C("M  
CE101: is no longer applicable to shipboard equipment Ih,~h[  
mhlJzGr*q  
· Conducted Susceptibility OkzfQ hC}  
IUu[`\b=  
CS101: applicability and limits were extended to 150 kHz yRieGf1'SD  
CS109: measurement procedures were revised 3j.f 3~"  
CS114: limits were revised @9vz%1B<l  
CS115: applicability was revised for several equipment classes JN3Oe5yB2@  
CS116: measurement procedures were revised; w #1l)+  
applicability was revised for several equipment classes X0U{9zP  
~@sx}u  
· Radiated Emissions >nl *aN  
Yq;S%.  
RE101: the 50 cm requirement was deleted; limits are more stringent pV>/ "K  
RE102: limits were revised for submarine equipment 6dg[   
j4brDlo?@  
· Radiated Susceptibility !_V*VD  
e@X~F6nP  
RS101: limits were revised for Navy applications; added an alternative test using the Helmholtz coil Vwv O@G7A  
RS103: added use of mode-tuned reverberation chambers above 200 MHz !^\|r<2M  
RS105: limits were revised for consistency with IEC Standards #UGbSOoCtn  
Bpqq-_@  
文章出自: 世科网 ZY][LU~l8  
&=s{ +0  
评价一下你浏览此帖子的感受

精彩

感动

搞笑

开心

愤怒

无聊

灌水
 
快速回复
限200 字节
如果您在写长篇帖子又不马上发表,建议存为草稿
 
上一个 下一个