论坛风格切换切换到宽版
  • 487阅读
  • 0回复

[标准综合]MIL-STD-461E与461D的区别 [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
离线adderss
 

发帖
449
世科币
347
威望
153
贡献值
264
银元
0
只看楼主 倒序阅读 使用道具 楼主  发表于: 2023-07-26
  MIL-STD-461E IeIv k55  
|IWm:[H3  
MIL-STD-461E: "DOD Interface Standard Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment" was published on August 20, 1999 and consolidates MIL-STD-461D and MIL-STD-462D into one Standard. The associated Data ITem Descriptions (DIDs) are as follows: itO1ROmu  
;q<:iaY9  
DID NUMBERDID TITLE "1ZVuI  
`zcpaE.@  
DI-EMCS-80199B Electromagnetic Interference Control Procedures (EMICP) u,@x7a,z  
DI-EMCS-80200B Electromagnetic Interference Test Report (EMITR) /Dk`?  
DI-EMCS-80201B Electromagnetic Interference Test Procedures (EMITP) Bq85g5Dc  
mw=keY9]  
Major changes MIL-STD-461D/462D to MIL-STD-461E: & =vi]z:[  
:Us NiR=l  
    isc]
  1. EUT hardware and software must be representative of production. Susceptibility scan rates and the frequency of measurement system test checks were revised.
#!M;4~Sfx  
Gh{vExH@5(  
· Conducted Emissions |Iq\ZX%q  
#c2JWDH1F  
CE101: is no longer applicable to shipboard equipment Aj2yAg  
Y !nE65  
· Conducted Susceptibility H9T'{R*FC  
u+vUv~4A6  
CS101: applicability and limits were extended to 150 kHz Y+#Vz IZw  
CS109: measurement procedures were revised |B.tBt^  
CS114: limits were revised >`c-Fqk  
CS115: applicability was revised for several equipment classes ;?0k>  
CS116: measurement procedures were revised; ^iaG>rvA  
applicability was revised for several equipment classes elf2!  
ril4*$e7^\  
· Radiated Emissions U#W9]il$  
]%VR Nm  
RE101: the 50 cm requirement was deleted; limits are more stringent c>%+y+b{  
RE102: limits were revised for submarine equipment 0R%R2p'wG  
?tLBEoUmKT  
· Radiated Susceptibility =)GhrWeVi4  
)ieT/0nt  
RS101: limits were revised for Navy applications; added an alternative test using the Helmholtz coil ^%V^\DK  
RS103: added use of mode-tuned reverberation chambers above 200 MHz xM3T7PV9  
RS105: limits were revised for consistency with IEC Standards D/1f> sl  
oyS43/."  
文章出自: 世科网 XUrxnJ4  
4ACL|R F)A  
评价一下你浏览此帖子的感受

精彩

感动

搞笑

开心

愤怒

无聊

灌水
 
快速回复
限200 字节
如果您提交过一次失败了,可以用”恢复数据”来恢复帖子内容
 
上一个 下一个