论坛风格切换切换到宽版
  • 771阅读
  • 0回复

[标准综合]MIL-STD-461E与461D的区别 [复制链接]

上一主题 下一主题
离线adderss
 

发帖
449
世科币
347
威望
153
贡献值
264
银元
0
只看楼主 倒序阅读 使用道具 楼主  发表于: 2023-07-26
  MIL-STD-461E Y|bGd_j  
oUH\SW8?  
MIL-STD-461E: "DOD Interface Standard Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment" was published on August 20, 1999 and consolidates MIL-STD-461D and MIL-STD-462D into one Standard. The associated Data ITem Descriptions (DIDs) are as follows: 0td;Ag  
. x$` i  
DID NUMBERDID TITLE .,4&/cd  
; 1WclQ!(  
DI-EMCS-80199B Electromagnetic Interference Control Procedures (EMICP) - >2ej4C  
DI-EMCS-80200B Electromagnetic Interference Test Report (EMITR) B dSTB"  
DI-EMCS-80201B Electromagnetic Interference Test Procedures (EMITP) QJ QQ-  
(NP=5lLH  
Major changes MIL-STD-461D/462D to MIL-STD-461E: p"ZPv~("V  
ezL*YM8?@  
    isc]
  1. EUT hardware and software must be representative of production. Susceptibility scan rates and the frequency of measurement system test checks were revised.
{)G3*>sG3  
Mc.KLz&,FC  
· Conducted Emissions g wk\[I`;  
!R-UL#w9W'  
CE101: is no longer applicable to shipboard equipment o)NWsUXf  
x9uA@$l^|  
· Conducted Susceptibility #df Aqg '  
;$nK ^  
CS101: applicability and limits were extended to 150 kHz j,Mp["X&  
CS109: measurement procedures were revised y`'Ly@s  
CS114: limits were revised %$b 5&>q  
CS115: applicability was revised for several equipment classes |%$d/<<PZ  
CS116: measurement procedures were revised; /+'@}u |  
applicability was revised for several equipment classes 5"{wnnY%K}  
X~lOFH;}q  
· Radiated Emissions &H* F  
#LF_*a0v  
RE101: the 50 cm requirement was deleted; limits are more stringent hd+JKh!u  
RE102: limits were revised for submarine equipment #~(@Ka.eA0  
!1|f ,9C  
· Radiated Susceptibility 'tF<7\!  
nLYyS#  
RS101: limits were revised for Navy applications; added an alternative test using the Helmholtz coil ^1}}-9q  
RS103: added use of mode-tuned reverberation chambers above 200 MHz df}B:?Ew.  
RS105: limits were revised for consistency with IEC Standards ;9d(GP}eE  
}i?P( Au  
文章出自: 世科网 6]na#<  
|(Io(e  
评价一下你浏览此帖子的感受

精彩

感动

搞笑

开心

愤怒

无聊

灌水
 
快速回复
限200 字节
如果您提交过一次失败了,可以用”恢复数据”来恢复帖子内容
 
上一个 下一个